tournament: work in terms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.66
, competition
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.55
Siblings olympic games
Weight: 0.69
, wimbledon
Weight: 0.66
, match
Weight: 0.65
, golf
Weight: 0.59
, slam
Weight: 0.48

Related properties

Property Similarity
work in terms 1.00
work in spellweaver 0.80
work in terms of squads 0.79
work 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tournament, work in terms)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(match, work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tournament, work in terms)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(match, work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(match, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tournament, work in terms)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(tournament, work in terms)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(tournament, work in terms)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(tournament, work in spellweaver)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(tournament, work in terms)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(tournament, work in spellweaver)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tournament, work in terms)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(tournament, work in spellweaver)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(tournament, work in terms)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tournament, work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(tournament, work in terms)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(tournament, work)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(tournament, work in terms)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(tournament, work in terms)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tournament, work in terms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tournament, work in terms)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(tournament, work in terms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tournament, work in terms)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(match, work)