tower: be in ranked

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents building
Weight: 0.73
, control tower
Weight: 0.70
, project
Weight: 0.65
, structure
Weight: 0.63
Siblings clock tower
Weight: 0.77
, cn tower
Weight: 0.68
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.42
, apartment building
Weight: 0.36
, skyscraper
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in ranked 1.00
be in ranked pool 0.88
be rated pg-13 0.77
be rated 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(tower, be in ranked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, be rated pg-13)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(tower, be in ranked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(skyscraper, be rated pg-13) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(skyscraper, be rated pg-13)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(tower, be in ranked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(tower, be in ranked)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(tower, be in ranked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(tower, be in ranked pool)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(tower, be in ranked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tower, be in ranked pool)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(tower, be in ranked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(tower, be in ranked pool)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(tower, be in ranked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(tower, be in ranked pool)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(tower, be in ranked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tower, be in ranked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(tower, be in ranked)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(tower, be in ranked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tower, be in ranked)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(tower, be in ranked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(skyscraper, be rated pg-13)