tower: is tilted

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents building
Weight: 0.73
, control tower
Weight: 0.70
, project
Weight: 0.65
, structure
Weight: 0.63
Siblings clock tower
Weight: 0.77
, cn tower
Weight: 0.68
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.42
, apartment building
Weight: 0.36
, skyscraper
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is tilted 1.00
be in pisa leaning 0.80
have slanted windows 0.76
be slanted in amsterdam 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(control tower, have slanted windows)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tower, is tilted)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tower, is tilted)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(control tower, have slanted windows)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tower, is tilted)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(control tower, have slanted windows)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(control tower, have slanted windows)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(tower, is tilted)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tower, is tilted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tower, is tilted)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(tower, is tilted)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(tower, is tilted)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tower, be in pisa leaning)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(tower, is tilted)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(tower, be in pisa leaning)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tower, is tilted)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(tower, be in pisa leaning)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(tower, is tilted)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tower, be in pisa leaning)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(tower, is tilted)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tower, is tilted)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tower, is tilted)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tower, is tilted)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tower, is tilted)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tower, is tilted)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(control tower, have slanted windows)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(tower, is tilted)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(control tower, have slanted windows)