town: be used to contain person

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.69
, community
Weight: 0.69
, school district
Weight: 0.64
, council
Weight: 0.64
Siblings village
Weight: 0.76
, quebec city
Weight: 0.76
, new york city
Weight: 0.73
, city
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to contain person 1.00
be used to contain resident 0.83
contain at least one idiot 0.83
be used to person 0.76
be used to contain townspeople 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to contain person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(village, contain at least one idiot)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to contain person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(city, be used to person)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(town, be used to contain person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(village, contain at least one idiot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(village, contain at least one idiot)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(town, be used to contain person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(city, be used to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(city, be used to person)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(town, be used to contain person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(town, be used to contain person)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(town, be used to contain person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(town, be used to contain townspeople)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(town, be used to contain person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(town, be used to contain resident)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(town, be used to contain person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(town, be used to contain resident)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(town, be used to contain person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to contain resident)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(town, be used to contain person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(town, be used to contain townspeople)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(town, be used to contain person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(town, be used to contain person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to contain person)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(town, be used to contain person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(town, be used to contain person)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to contain person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(village, contain at least one idiot)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to contain person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(city, be used to person)