town: be used to person to party in

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.69
, community
Weight: 0.69
, school district
Weight: 0.64
, council
Weight: 0.64
Siblings village
Weight: 0.76
, quebec city
Weight: 0.76
, new york city
Weight: 0.73
, city
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to person to party in 1.00
be used to person 0.83
be used to person to work in 0.78
be used to person to live in 0.77
has lot of person in them 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to person to party in)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(village, be used to person to live in)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to person to party in)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(city, be used to person)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to person to party in)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(city, has lot of person in them)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(town, be used to person to party in)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(city, be used to person)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(city, be used to person)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(town, be used to person to party in)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(village, be used to person to live in)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(village, be used to person to live in)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(town, be used to person to party in)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(city, has lot of person in them)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(city, has lot of person in them)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(town, be used to person to party in)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(town, be used to person to party in)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(town, be used to person to party in)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(town, be used to person to work in)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(town, be used to person to party in)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(town, be used to person to live in)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(town, be used to person to party in)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(town, be used to person to work in)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(town, be used to person to party in)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to person to work in)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(town, be used to person to party in)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(town, be used to person to work in)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(town, be used to person to party in)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to person to live in)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(town, be used to person to party in)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(town, be used to person to live in)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(town, be used to person to party in)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(town, be used to person to live in)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(town, be used to person to party in)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(town, be used to person to party in)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to person to party in)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(town, be used to person to party in)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(town, be used to person to party in)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to person to party in)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(city, has lot of person in them)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to person to party in)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(city, be used to person)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to person to party in)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(village, be used to person to live in)