toy: be color

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents merchandise
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.59
, object
Weight: 0.59
, gift
Weight: 0.59
Siblings toy soldier
Weight: 0.75
, toy car
Weight: 0.72
, doll
Weight: 0.66
, vibrator
Weight: 0.64
, candy cane
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be color 1.00
be red and white 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(toy, be color) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, be red and white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(toy, be color) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(candy cane, be red and white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(candy cane, be red and white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(toy, be color) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(toy, be color)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(toy, be color) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(toy, be color) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(toy, be color)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(toy, be color) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(toy, be color)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(toy, be color) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(candy cane, be red and white)