toy: were made of wood

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents merchandise
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.59
, object
Weight: 0.59
, gift
Weight: 0.59
Siblings toy soldier
Weight: 0.75
, toy car
Weight: 0.72
, doll
Weight: 0.66
, vibrator
Weight: 0.64
, candy cane
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
were made of wood 1.00
were made in 1960s 0.81
were made 0.81
be made of plastic 0.78
be made 0.77
were made in days 0.75
is made 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(toy car, be made)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(doll, be made)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, be made)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(doll, is made)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(toy car, is made)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(toy car, is made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(toy car, is made)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(doll, is made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(doll, is made)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(candy cane, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(candy cane, be made)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(doll, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(doll, be made)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(toy car, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(toy car, be made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(toy, were made of wood)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(toy, be made of plastic)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(toy, be made of plastic)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(toy, be made of plastic)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(toy, is made)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(toy, were made in 1960s)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(toy, were made in 1960s)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(toy, were made in 1960s)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(toy, were made)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(toy, be made of plastic)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(toy, be made)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(toy, be made)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(toy, is made)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(toy, be made)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(toy, were made)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(toy, were made)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(toy, were made in 1960s)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(toy, is made)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(toy, be made)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toy, were made)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(toy, is made)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(toy, were made of wood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(toy, were made of wood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(candy cane, be made)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(doll, be made)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(toy car, be made)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(toy car, is made)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(toy, were made of wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(doll, is made)