track: be better than hockey

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents driver
Weight: 0.58
, evidence
Weight: 0.58
, service
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.58
Siblings know
Weight: 0.63
, heart
Weight: 0.62
, cross country
Weight: 0.61
, road
Weight: 0.61
, bullet train
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than hockey 1.00
is best sport ever 0.76
is good sport 0.76
is sports 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(track, be better than hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(track, be better than hockey)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(track, be better than hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(track, is sports)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(track, be better than hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(track, is good sport)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(track, be better than hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(track, is best sport ever)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(track, be better than hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(track, is good sport)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(track, be better than hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(track, is sports)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(track, be better than hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(track, is sports)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(track, be better than hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(track, is best sport ever)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(track, be better than hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(track, is best sport ever)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(track, be better than hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(track, is good sport)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(track, be better than hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(track, is good sport)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(track, be better than hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(track, is best sport ever)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(track, be better than hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(track, is sports)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(track, be better than hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(track, be better than hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(track, be better than hockey)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(track, be better than hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(track, be better than hockey)