trade: was important in early japan

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deal
Weight: 0.65
, change
Weight: 0.59
, tax
Weight: 0.59
, scheme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings auto mechanic
Weight: 0.63
, blacksmith
Weight: 0.61
, plumbing
Weight: 0.61
, machinist
Weight: 0.61
, welding
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important in early japan 1.00
was important in japan 0.96
was with asia important 0.79
was with asia important to europeans 0.79
was with england important 0.79
was for russia in 15-1600s 0.79
was important to development of europe 0.79
was with england important to economy 0.79
was between america affected by war 0.78
was for russia 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(trade, was important in early japan)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(trade, was important in early japan)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(trade, was important in early japan)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(trade, was with asia important to europeans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(trade, was important in early japan)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(trade, was for russia in 15-1600s)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(trade, was important in early japan)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(trade, was between america affected by war)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(trade, was important in early japan)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(trade, was for russia in 15-1600s)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(trade, was important in early japan)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(trade, was between america affected by war)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(trade, was important in early japan)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(trade, was with asia important to europeans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(trade, was important in early japan)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(trade, was with asia important to europeans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(trade, was important in early japan)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(trade, was between america affected by war)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(trade, was important in early japan)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(trade, was for russia in 15-1600s)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(trade, was important in early japan)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(trade, was for russia in 15-1600s)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(trade, was important in early japan)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(trade, was between america affected by war)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(trade, was important in early japan)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(trade, was with asia important to europeans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(trade, was important in early japan)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(trade, was important in early japan)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(trade, was important in early japan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(trade, was important in early japan)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(trade, was important in early japan)