trade: was important in middle ages

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deal
Weight: 0.65
, change
Weight: 0.59
, tax
Weight: 0.59
, scheme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings auto mechanic
Weight: 0.63
, blacksmith
Weight: 0.61
, plumbing
Weight: 0.61
, welding
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important in middle ages 1.00
be different than than middle ages 0.92
was in middle ages in europe 0.89
was nearly nonexistent during most of middle ages 0.87
be in middle east 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(trade, was important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(trade, was important in middle ages)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(trade, was important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(trade, be different than than middle ages)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(trade, was important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(trade, was nearly nonexistent during most of middle ages)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(trade, was important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(trade, was nearly nonexistent during most of middle ages)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(trade, was important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(trade, was nearly nonexistent during most of middle ages)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(trade, was important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(trade, be different than than middle ages)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(trade, was important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(trade, be different than than middle ages)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(trade, was important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(trade, was in middle ages in europe)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(trade, was important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(trade, was nearly nonexistent during most of middle ages)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(trade, was important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(trade, was in middle ages in europe)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(trade, was important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(trade, was in middle ages in europe)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(trade, was important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(trade, was in middle ages in europe)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(trade, was important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(trade, be different than than middle ages)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(trade, was important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(trade, was important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(trade, was important in middle ages)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(trade, was important in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(trade, was important in middle ages)