trading card: is against

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents card
Weight: 0.75
, merchandise
Weight: 0.59
, toy
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.57
, product
Weight: 0.56
Siblings smart card
Weight: 0.41
, credit card
Weight: 0.40
, wild card
Weight: 0.39
, sound card
Weight: 0.39
, debit card
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
is against 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(trading card, is against) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(smart card, is against)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(trading card, is against) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(smart card, is against) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(smart card, is against)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(trading card, is against) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(trading card, is against)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(trading card, is against) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(trading card, is against) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(trading card, is against)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(trading card, is against) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(trading card, is against)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(trading card, is against) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(smart card, is against)