traffic jam: be at freeway

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents traffic
Weight: 0.79
, problem
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.62
Siblings traffic light
Weight: 0.41
, traffic cop
Weight: 0.35
, loud music
Weight: 0.33
, air pollution
Weight: 0.33
, loud noise
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at freeway 1.00
be at on freeway 0.99
be at intersection 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(traffic jam, be at freeway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(traffic cop, be at freeway)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(traffic jam, be at freeway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(traffic cop, be at on freeway)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(traffic jam, be at freeway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, be at intersection)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(traffic jam, be at freeway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(traffic cop, be at freeway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(traffic cop, be at freeway)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(traffic jam, be at freeway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(traffic cop, be at on freeway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(traffic cop, be at on freeway)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(traffic jam, be at freeway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(traffic light, be at intersection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(traffic light, be at intersection)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(traffic jam, be at freeway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(traffic jam, be at freeway)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(traffic jam, be at freeway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(traffic jam, be at freeway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(traffic jam, be at freeway)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(traffic jam, be at freeway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(traffic jam, be at freeway)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(traffic jam, be at freeway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(traffic cop, be at on freeway)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(traffic jam, be at freeway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(traffic cop, be at freeway)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(traffic jam, be at freeway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(traffic light, be at intersection)