traffic jam: be in big cities

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents traffic
Weight: 0.79
, problem
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.62
Siblings traffic light
Weight: 0.41
, traffic cop
Weight: 0.35
, loud music
Weight: 0.33
, air pollution
Weight: 0.33
, signal
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in big cities 1.00
take place in big cities 0.94
take place in cities 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(traffic jam, be in big cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(traffic jam, be in big cities)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(traffic jam, be in big cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(traffic jam, take place in big cities)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(traffic jam, be in big cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(traffic jam, take place in big cities)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(traffic jam, be in big cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(traffic jam, take place in cities)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(traffic jam, be in big cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(traffic jam, take place in cities)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(traffic jam, be in big cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(traffic jam, take place in big cities)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(traffic jam, be in big cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(traffic jam, take place in cities)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(traffic jam, be in big cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(traffic jam, take place in cities)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(traffic jam, be in big cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(traffic jam, take place in big cities)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(traffic jam, be in big cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(traffic jam, be in big cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(traffic jam, be in big cities)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(traffic jam, be in big cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(traffic jam, be in big cities)