traffic light: have cameras

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents traffic
Weight: 0.83
, light
Weight: 0.76
, intersection
Weight: 0.70
, signal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red light
Weight: 0.78
, traffic jam
Weight: 0.41
, light source
Weight: 0.38
, light bulb
Weight: 0.38
, black light
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have cameras 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(intersection, have cameras)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(traffic light, have cameras)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(traffic light, have cameras)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(intersection, have cameras)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, have cameras)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(intersection, have cameras)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(intersection, have cameras)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(traffic light, have cameras)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(traffic light, have cameras)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(traffic light, have cameras)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(traffic light, have cameras)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(traffic light, have cameras)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(traffic light, have cameras)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, have cameras)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(traffic light, have cameras)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(traffic light, have cameras)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, have cameras)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(intersection, have cameras)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(traffic light, have cameras)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(intersection, have cameras)