traffic: be in austin

Related concepts

Parents	hazard Weight: 0.63 , activity Weight: 0.62 , signal Weight: 0.61 , situation Weight: 0.61 , stop Weight: 0.60
Siblings	traffic light Weight: 0.83 , business activity Weight: 0.34 , air pollution Weight: 0.34 , motor vehicle Weight: 0.32 , sexual activity Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be in austin	1.00
be in austin shitty	0.94
be in atlanta	0.83
be in atlanta bad	0.82
be in miami	0.81
be in texas	0.81
be in chicago	0.81
be bad in nyc	0.81
be in miami bad	0.81
be in florida	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(traffic, be in austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Salient(traffic, be in austin)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(traffic, be in austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(traffic, be bad in nyc)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(traffic, be in austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Salient(traffic, be bad in nyc)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(traffic, be in austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(traffic, be bad in nyc)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.19

Typical(traffic, be in austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(traffic, be bad in nyc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(traffic, be in austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(traffic, be in austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(traffic, be in austin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(traffic, be in austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(traffic, be in austin)