train station: have ceilings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents station
Weight: 0.78
, bus
Weight: 0.69
, building
Weight: 0.66
, train
Weight: 0.66
Siblings bus station
Weight: 0.78
, gas station
Weight: 0.41
, base station
Weight: 0.41
, radio station
Weight: 0.41
, television station
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
have ceilings 1.00
have high ceilings 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(building, have high ceilings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(train station, have ceilings)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(train station, have ceilings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(building, have high ceilings)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(train station, have ceilings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(building, have high ceilings)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(building, have high ceilings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(train station, have ceilings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(train station, have ceilings)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(train station, have ceilings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(train station, have ceilings)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(train station, have ceilings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(train station, have high ceilings)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(train station, have ceilings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(train station, have high ceilings)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(train station, have ceilings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(train station, have high ceilings)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(train station, have ceilings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(train station, have high ceilings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(train station, have ceilings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(train station, have ceilings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(train station, have ceilings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(train station, have ceilings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(train station, have ceilings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(train station, have ceilings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(building, have high ceilings)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(train station, have ceilings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(building, have high ceilings)