train: be better than canal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accident
Weight: 0.64
, transportation
Weight: 0.62
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.60
, attraction
Weight: 0.59
, film
Weight: 0.58
Siblings bullet train
Weight: 0.79
, bus station
Weight: 0.35
, bus
Weight: 0.35
, station wagon
Weight: 0.34
, car accident
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than canal 1.00
be better than canal economically 0.92
were better than canals 0.90
be better than theatre 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(train, be better than canal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(train, be better than canal)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(train, be better than canal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(train, be better than canal economically)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(train, be better than canal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(train, be better than canal economically)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(train, be better than canal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(train, were better than canals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(train, be better than canal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(train, be better than canal economically)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(train, be better than canal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(train, were better than canals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(train, be better than canal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(train, were better than canals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(train, be better than canal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(train, be better than canal economically)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(train, be better than canal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(train, were better than canals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(train, be better than canal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(train, be better than canal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(train, be better than canal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(train, be better than canal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(train, be better than canal)