transcription: be more complex in eukaryotes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, function
Weight: 0.59
, system
Weight: 0.57
, information
Weight: 0.56
Siblings rna polymerase
Weight: 0.62
, translation
Weight: 0.33
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, cellular respiration
Weight: 0.33
, coding
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more complex in eukaryotes 1.00
occur in nucleus of eukaryotes 0.90
be terminated in eukaryotes 0.84
is separated in eukaryotic cells 0.80
is important in protein synthesis 0.77
be important to protein synthesis 0.77
be related to central dogma of molecular biology 0.76
be related to dogma of molecular biology 0.76
be necessary for protein synthesis 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma of molecular biology)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to central dogma of molecular biology)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(translation, is important in protein synthesis)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma of molecular biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(translation, be related to dogma of molecular biology)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(translation, is important in protein synthesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(translation, is important in protein synthesis)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(translation, be related to central dogma of molecular biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(translation, be related to central dogma of molecular biology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(transcription, be terminated in eukaryotes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be terminated in eukaryotes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(transcription, be terminated in eukaryotes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(transcription, occur in nucleus of eukaryotes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(transcription, occur in nucleus of eukaryotes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(transcription, occur in nucleus of eukaryotes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(transcription, is separated in eukaryotic cells)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(transcription, be terminated in eukaryotes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(transcription, is separated in eukaryotic cells)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(transcription, occur in nucleus of eukaryotes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(transcription, is separated in eukaryotic cells)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(transcription, is separated in eukaryotic cells)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(transcription, be related to dogma of molecular biology)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(transcription, be related to central dogma of molecular biology)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(transcription, be necessary for protein synthesis)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(transcription, be important to protein synthesis)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(transcription, is important in protein synthesis)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(transcription, be related to dogma of molecular biology)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(transcription, be related to central dogma of molecular biology)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(transcription, be necessary for protein synthesis)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be related to central dogma of molecular biology)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be related to dogma of molecular biology)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(transcription, be related to dogma of molecular biology)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be necessary for protein synthesis)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(transcription, is important in protein synthesis)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(transcription, be important to protein synthesis)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be important to protein synthesis)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(transcription, is important in protein synthesis)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(transcription, be related to central dogma of molecular biology)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(transcription, be necessary for protein synthesis)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(transcription, be important to protein synthesis)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(transcription, is important in protein synthesis)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(translation, be related to dogma of molecular biology)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(translation, be related to central dogma of molecular biology)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be more complex in eukaryotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(translation, is important in protein synthesis)