transcription: is biology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, function
Weight: 0.59
, system
Weight: 0.57
, information
Weight: 0.56
Siblings rna polymerase
Weight: 0.62
, translation
Weight: 0.33
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, cellular respiration
Weight: 0.33
, coding
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is biology 1.00
be related to dogma of molecular biology 0.87
be related to central dogma of molecular biology 0.87
be related to dogma of biology 0.86
be related to central dogma of biology 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma of molecular biology)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma of biology)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to central dogma of molecular biology)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to central dogma of biology)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma of molecular biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(translation, be related to dogma of molecular biology)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma of biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(translation, be related to dogma of biology)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(translation, be related to central dogma of molecular biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(translation, be related to central dogma of molecular biology)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(translation, be related to central dogma of biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(translation, be related to central dogma of biology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(transcription, is biology)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(transcription, be related to dogma of molecular biology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(transcription, be related to dogma of biology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(transcription, be related to central dogma of molecular biology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(transcription, be related to dogma of molecular biology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(transcription, be related to dogma of molecular biology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(transcription, be related to central dogma of biology)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(transcription, be related to dogma of biology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(transcription, be related to dogma of biology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(transcription, be related to central dogma of molecular biology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(transcription, be related to central dogma of molecular biology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(transcription, be related to central dogma of biology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(transcription, be related to central dogma of biology)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be related to central dogma of molecular biology)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be related to dogma of molecular biology)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be related to central dogma of biology)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be related to dogma of biology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(transcription, is biology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(transcription, is biology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(translation, be related to dogma of molecular biology)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(translation, be related to dogma of biology)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(translation, be related to central dogma of molecular biology)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(transcription, is biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(translation, be related to central dogma of biology)