transfer: has quality price

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disposition
Weight: 0.63
, change
Weight: 0.62
, action
Weight: 0.61
, movement
Weight: 0.59
Siblings exchange
Weight: 0.66
, distribution
Weight: 0.62
, assignment
Weight: 0.62
, lease
Weight: 0.60
, bequest
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality price 1.00
price issue 0.86
price important issue 0.84
is pricing 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(transfer, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(transfer, has quality price)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(transfer, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(transfer, price issue)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(transfer, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(transfer, is pricing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(transfer, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(transfer, price issue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(transfer, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(transfer, price important issue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(transfer, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(transfer, price issue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(transfer, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(transfer, price issue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(transfer, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(transfer, is pricing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(transfer, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(transfer, is pricing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(transfer, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(transfer, is pricing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(transfer, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(transfer, price important issue)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(transfer, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(transfer, price important issue)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(transfer, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(transfer, price important issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(transfer, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(transfer, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(transfer, has quality price)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(transfer, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(transfer, has quality price)