transformation: is related operations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents change
Weight: 0.66
, function
Weight: 0.59
, effect
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings growth
Weight: 0.64
, shift
Weight: 0.55
, normalization
Weight: 0.55
, metamorphosis
Weight: 0.50
, inversion
Weight: 0.48

Related properties

Property Similarity
is related operations 1.00
is related operations important 0.98
is operations important 0.94
has state operations 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(transformation, is related operations)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(transformation, is related operations)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(transformation, is related operations)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(transformation, is related operations important)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(transformation, is related operations)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(transformation, is operations important)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(transformation, is related operations)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(transformation, has state operations)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(transformation, is related operations)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(transformation, is related operations important)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(transformation, is related operations)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(transformation, is operations important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(transformation, is related operations)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(transformation, is related operations important)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(transformation, is related operations)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(transformation, is related operations important)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(transformation, is related operations)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(transformation, has state operations)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(transformation, is related operations)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(transformation, is operations important)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(transformation, is related operations)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(transformation, is operations important)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(transformation, is related operations)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(transformation, has state operations)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(transformation, is related operations)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(transformation, has state operations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(transformation, is related operations)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(transformation, is related operations)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(transformation, is related operations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(transformation, is related operations)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(transformation, is related operations)