transformer: be connected in parallel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.64
, equipment
Weight: 0.63
, system
Weight: 0.62
, film
Weight: 0.61
Siblings compressor
Weight: 0.35
, generator
Weight: 0.35
, rectifier
Weight: 0.35
, boiler
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be connected in parallel 1.00
be connected 0.87
be operated in parallel 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(transformer, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(generator, be connected in parallel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(transformer, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(generator, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(generator, be connected in parallel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(transformer, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(transformer, be connected in parallel)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(transformer, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(transformer, be operated in parallel)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(transformer, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(transformer, be operated in parallel)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(transformer, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(transformer, be connected)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(transformer, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(transformer, be connected)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(transformer, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(transformer, be connected)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(transformer, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(transformer, be connected)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(transformer, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(transformer, be operated in parallel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(transformer, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(transformer, be operated in parallel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(transformer, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(transformer, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(transformer, be connected in parallel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(transformer, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(transformer, be connected in parallel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(transformer, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(generator, be connected in parallel)