transformer: have oil

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.64
, equipment
Weight: 0.63
, system
Weight: 0.62
, film
Weight: 0.61
Siblings compressor
Weight: 0.35
, generator
Weight: 0.35
, rectifier
Weight: 0.35
, boiler
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have oil 1.00
use oil 0.96
need oil 0.95
have oil in them 0.93
be filled with oil 0.84
be immersed in oil 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(transformer, have oil)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(compressor, need oil)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(transformer, have oil)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(compressor, use oil)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(transformer, have oil)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(compressor, use oil)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(compressor, use oil)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(transformer, have oil)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(compressor, need oil)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(compressor, need oil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(transformer, have oil)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(transformer, have oil)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(transformer, have oil)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(transformer, use oil)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(transformer, have oil)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(transformer, use oil)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(transformer, have oil)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(transformer, use oil)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(transformer, have oil)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(transformer, need oil)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(transformer, have oil)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(transformer, have oil in them)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(transformer, have oil)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(transformer, have oil)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(transformer, have oil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(transformer, have oil)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(transformer, have oil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(transformer, have oil)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(compressor, use oil)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(transformer, have oil)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(compressor, need oil)