translation: be related to dogma

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents version
Weight: 0.62
, interpretation
Weight: 0.60
, localization
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.59
Siblings english
Weight: 0.64
, russian
Weight: 0.58
, hebrew
Weight: 0.57
, chinese
Weight: 0.55
, transcription
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to dogma 1.00
be related to central dogma 0.96
be related to dogma of biology 0.93
be related to central dogma of biology 0.91
be related to dogma of molecular biology 0.84
be related to central dogma of molecular biology 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be related to dogma)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be related to central dogma)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be related to dogma of biology)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be related to central dogma of biology)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be related to central dogma of molecular biology)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be related to dogma of molecular biology)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(transcription, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(transcription, be related to dogma)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(transcription, be related to central dogma)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(transcription, be related to central dogma)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(transcription, be related to dogma of biology)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(transcription, be related to dogma of biology)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(transcription, be related to central dogma of biology)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(transcription, be related to central dogma of biology)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(transcription, be related to dogma of molecular biology)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(transcription, be related to dogma of molecular biology)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(transcription, be related to central dogma of molecular biology)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(transcription, be related to central dogma of molecular biology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(translation, be related to dogma)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(translation, be related to central dogma)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(translation, be related to dogma of biology)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(translation, be related to central dogma of biology)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(translation, be related to central dogma)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(translation, be related to dogma of biology)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(translation, be related to dogma of molecular biology)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(translation, be related to central dogma of molecular biology)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(translation, be related to dogma of biology)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(translation, be related to central dogma of biology)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(translation, be related to dogma of molecular biology)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(translation, be related to dogma of molecular biology)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(translation, be related to central dogma)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(translation, be related to central dogma of molecular biology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(translation, be related to central dogma of biology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma of biology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma of molecular biology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(translation, be related to central dogma of molecular biology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to central dogma of biology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to central dogma of molecular biology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to central dogma)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(translation, be related to dogma)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(transcription, be related to dogma)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(transcription, be related to dogma of biology)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(transcription, be related to central dogma)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(transcription, be related to central dogma of biology)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(transcription, be related to dogma of molecular biology)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(translation, be related to dogma)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(transcription, be related to central dogma of molecular biology)