transmission: go bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.61
, parameter
Weight: 0.60
, technology
Weight: 0.60
, internal combustion engine
Weight: 0.60
Siblings diesel engine
Weight: 0.34
, electric motor
Weight: 0.33
, steam engine
Weight: 0.33
, distribution
Weight: 0.33
, voltage
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
go bad 1.00
has quality bad 0.79
is flush bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(technology, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(transmission, go bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(transmission, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(technology, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(transmission, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(technology, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(technology, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(transmission, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(transmission, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(transmission, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(transmission, go bad)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(transmission, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(transmission, is flush bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(transmission, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(transmission, is flush bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(transmission, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(transmission, is flush bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(transmission, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(transmission, is flush bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(transmission, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(transmission, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(transmission, go bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(transmission, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(transmission, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(transmission, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(transmission, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, has quality bad)