transom: rot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents front door
Weight: 0.46
, option
Weight: 0.45
, project
Weight: 0.39
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.38
, window
Weight: 0.38
Siblings rear window
Weight: 0.31
, deck
Weight: 0.29
, window pane
Weight: 0.29
, dashboard
Weight: 0.29
, stock option
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
rot 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(transom, rot)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(deck, rot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(transom, rot)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(deck, rot)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(deck, rot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(transom, rot)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(transom, rot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(transom, rot)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(transom, rot)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(transom, rot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(transom, rot)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(transom, rot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(transom, rot)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(deck, rot)