transport: be in london

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.57
, domain
Weight: 0.57
, option
Weight: 0.57
Siblings active transport
Weight: 0.76
, ferry
Weight: 0.56
, lorry
Weight: 0.44
, aviation
Weight: 0.32
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in london 1.00
be expensive in london 0.96
be in boston 0.79
be in seattle 0.78
is spain 0.78
be expensive in sydney 0.78
go to paris 0.78
be in america 0.78
be in uk 0.78
was in 1970 britain 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lorry, go to paris)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ferry, is spain)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aviation, be in america)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(aviation, be in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(aviation, be in america)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(lorry, go to paris) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(lorry, go to paris)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ferry, is spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(ferry, is spain)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(transport, be in london)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transport, be expensive in london)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(transport, be expensive in london)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(transport, be expensive in london)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(transport, was in 1970 britain)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(transport, was in 1970 britain)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(transport, be expensive in london)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(transport, be in uk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in uk)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(transport, was in 1970 britain)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(transport, be in uk)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(transport, be in uk)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(transport, was in 1970 britain)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in london)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(transport, be in london)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(aviation, be in america)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lorry, go to paris)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ferry, is spain)