transportation: be at subway

Related concepts

Parents	necessity Weight: 0.64 , resource Weight: 0.63 , area Weight: 0.63 , system Weight: 0.62
Siblings	bus station Weight: 0.66 , train Weight: 0.62 , plane ticket Weight: 0.60 , education Weight: 0.33 , national park Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at subway	1.00
be at on subway	0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(transportation, be at subway) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(train, be at on subway)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(transportation, be at subway) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(train, be at on subway) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(train, be at on subway)

Salient implies Plausible

0.09

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(transportation, be at subway) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(transportation, be at subway)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.95

Salient(transportation, be at subway) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(transportation, be at subway) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(transportation, be at subway)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(transportation, be at subway) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(transportation, be at subway)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(transportation, be at subway) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(train, be at on subway)