trash container: be at alley

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.57
Siblings garbage
Weight: 0.35
, jar
Weight: 0.33
, suitcase
Weight: 0.32
, crate
Weight: 0.32
, bucket
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at alley 1.00
be at street 0.81
be at on street 0.79
be at dumpster 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(trash container, be at alley)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be at on street)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(trash container, be at alley)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be at dumpster)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(trash container, be at alley)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(garbage, be at dumpster)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(garbage, be at dumpster)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(trash container, be at alley)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(garbage, be at on street)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(garbage, be at on street)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(trash container, be at alley)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(trash container, be at alley)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(trash container, be at alley)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(trash container, be at street)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(trash container, be at alley)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(trash container, be at street)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(trash container, be at alley)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(trash container, be at street)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(trash container, be at alley)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(trash container, be at street)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(trash container, be at alley)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(trash container, be at alley)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(trash container, be at alley)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(trash container, be at alley)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(trash container, be at alley)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(trash container, be at alley)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(garbage, be at dumpster)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(trash container, be at alley)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(garbage, be at on street)