trash: be at grind

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trash can
Weight: 0.75
, container
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.59
, job
Weight: 0.55
Siblings trash bag
Weight: 0.37
, garbage can
Weight: 0.37
, garbage
Weight: 0.36
, litter
Weight: 0.34
, waste
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at grind 1.00
be at on grind 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(litter, be at grind)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be at on grind)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be at grind)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(trash, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(garbage, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(garbage, be at grind)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(trash, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(garbage, be at on grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(garbage, be at on grind)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(trash, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(litter, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(litter, be at grind)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(trash, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(trash, be at grind)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(trash, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(trash, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at grind)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(trash, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(trash, be at grind)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(litter, be at grind)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(garbage, be at grind)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(garbage, be at on grind)