trash: be at land fill

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trash can
Weight: 0.75
, container
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.59
, job
Weight: 0.55
Siblings trash bag
Weight: 0.37
, garbage can
Weight: 0.37
, garbage
Weight: 0.36
, litter
Weight: 0.34
, waste
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at land fill 1.00
fill can 0.84
be used to fill up landfill 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at land fill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(garbage, fill can)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(trash, be at land fill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(garbage, fill can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(garbage, fill can)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(trash, be at land fill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(trash, be at land fill)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(trash, be at land fill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(trash, be used to fill up landfill)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(trash, be at land fill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(trash, be used to fill up landfill)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(trash, be at land fill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(trash, be used to fill up landfill)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(trash, be at land fill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(trash, be used to fill up landfill)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(trash, be at land fill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(trash, be at land fill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at land fill)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(trash, be at land fill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(trash, be at land fill)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at land fill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(garbage, fill can)