travel: be in deep water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents air travel
Weight: 0.74
, operating expense
Weight: 0.65
, adventure
Weight: 0.62
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, traveler
Weight: 0.59
Siblings time travel
Weight: 0.38
, trip
Weight: 0.36
, ticket
Weight: 0.33
, camping
Weight: 0.32
, snow skiing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in deep water 1.00
be in water 0.85
be on water 0.83
be in differently deep space 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(travel, be in deep water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(time travel, be in differently deep space)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(travel, be in deep water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(time travel, be in differently deep space) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(time travel, be in differently deep space)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(travel, be in deep water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(travel, be in deep water)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(travel, be in deep water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(travel, be on water)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(travel, be in deep water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(travel, be in water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(travel, be in deep water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(travel, be in water)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(travel, be in deep water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(travel, be in water)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(travel, be in deep water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(travel, be on water)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(travel, be in deep water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(travel, be on water)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(travel, be in deep water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(travel, be in water)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(travel, be in deep water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(travel, be on water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(travel, be in deep water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(travel, be in deep water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(travel, be in deep water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(travel, be in deep water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(travel, be in deep water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(travel, be in deep water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(time travel, be in differently deep space)