trax: is blind

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents example
Weight: 0.30
, show
Weight: 0.29
Siblings simpsons
Weight: 0.24
, raw
Weight: 0.24
, talk show
Weight: 0.24
, vision
Weight: 0.24
, instance
Weight: 0.24

Related properties

Property Similarity
is blind 1.00
have blind spot 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(trax, is blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(vision, have blind spot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(trax, is blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(vision, have blind spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(vision, have blind spot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(trax, is blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(trax, is blind)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(trax, is blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(trax, is blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(trax, is blind)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(trax, is blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(trax, is blind)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(trax, is blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(vision, have blind spot)