tree frog: be helpful to humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.77
, amphibian
Weight: 0.77
, animal
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.66
, frog
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.40
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.39
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, monkey
Weight: 0.38
, owl
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be helpful to humans 1.00
be harmful to humans 0.87
affect humans 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tree frog, be helpful to humans)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(tree frog, be helpful to humans)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(tree frog, be helpful to humans)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(tree frog, be harmful to humans)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(tree frog, be helpful to humans)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tree frog, be harmful to humans)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(tree frog, be helpful to humans)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(tree frog, affect humans)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(tree frog, be helpful to humans)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(tree frog, affect humans)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tree frog, be helpful to humans)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tree frog, affect humans)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tree frog, be helpful to humans)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(tree frog, be harmful to humans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(tree frog, be helpful to humans)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be harmful to humans)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(tree frog, be helpful to humans)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, affect humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(tree frog, be helpful to humans)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tree frog, be helpful to humans)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be helpful to humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tree frog, be helpful to humans)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tree frog, be helpful to humans)