tree frog: has physical part pads

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.77
, amphibian
Weight: 0.77
, animal
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.66
, frog
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.40
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.39
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, monkey
Weight: 0.38
, owl
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part pads 1.00
have sticky pads 0.88
has physical part legs 0.81
has physical part feet 0.77
has physical part eyes 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part pads)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(frog, has physical part legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part pads)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(frog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part pads)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part legs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part eyes)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part legs)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part eyes)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(owl, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(tree frog, has physical part pads)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(frog, has physical part legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(tree frog, has physical part pads)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(frog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(tree frog, has physical part pads)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(owl, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(owl, has physical part eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(tree frog, has physical part pads)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, have sticky pads)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(tree frog, have sticky pads)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part legs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tree frog, have sticky pads)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part feet)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part legs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(tree frog, have sticky pads)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(tree frog, has physical part feet)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(tree frog, has physical part legs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(tree frog, has physical part feet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(tree frog, has physical part legs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part pads)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part pads)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part legs)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part eyes)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(owl, has physical part eyes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part legs)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part eyes)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(tree frog, has physical part pads) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)