tree: be brown and green

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents christmas tree
Weight: 0.81
, berry
Weight: 0.63
, vegetation
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.86
, apple tree
Weight: 0.80
, maple tree
Weight: 0.77
, oak tree
Weight: 0.77
, ficus
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be brown and green 1.00
be green 0.92
be at green house 0.87
has green leave 0.85
be yellow or red 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tree, be brown and green)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at green house)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tree, be brown and green)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ficus, be at green house)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at green house)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tree, be brown and green)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(tree, be brown and green)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tree, be brown and green)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(tree, be green)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(tree, be brown and green)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tree, be green)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(tree, be brown and green)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(tree, has green leave)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tree, be brown and green)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tree, be green)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tree, be brown and green)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tree, has green leave)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(tree, be brown and green)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tree, has green leave)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tree, be brown and green)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(tree, has green leave)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(tree, be brown and green)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(tree, be green)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(tree, be brown and green)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tree, be brown and green)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tree, be brown and green)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tree, be brown and green)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tree, be brown and green)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tree, be brown and green)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ficus, be at green house)