tree: be root in grind

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents christmas tree
Weight: 0.81
, berry
Weight: 0.63
, vegetation
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.86
, apple tree
Weight: 0.80
, maple tree
Weight: 0.77
, oak tree
Weight: 0.77
, ficus
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be root in grind 1.00
have root 0.91
has root 0.90
be at grind 0.85
grow on grind 0.85
shade grind 0.81
has root branch leave and trunk 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tree, be root in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at grind)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tree, be root in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at grind)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tree, be root in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(apple tree, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at grind)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tree, be root in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ficus, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at grind)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tree, be root in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(tree, be root in grind)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tree, be root in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tree, have root)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(tree, be root in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(tree, has root)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(tree, be root in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(tree, have root)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tree, be root in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(tree, has root)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tree, be root in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tree, have root)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tree, be root in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tree, has root)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(tree, be root in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(tree, have root)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(tree, be root in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(tree, has root)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(tree, be root in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(tree, be root in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tree, be root in grind)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tree, be root in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(tree, be root in grind)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tree, be root in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(ficus, be at grind)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tree, be root in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at grind)