tree: be tall

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents christmas tree
Weight: 0.81
, berry
Weight: 0.63
, vegetation
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.86
, apple tree
Weight: 0.80
, maple tree
Weight: 0.77
, oak tree
Weight: 0.77
, ficus
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be tall 1.00
grow tall 0.92
has evolve into tall strong attractive tree 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(tree, be tall)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, has evolve into tall strong attractive tree)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tree, be tall)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(oak tree, has evolve into tall strong attractive tree)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(oak tree, has evolve into tall strong attractive tree)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tree, be tall)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(tree, be tall)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(tree, be tall)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(tree, grow tall)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(tree, be tall)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(tree, grow tall)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(tree, be tall)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(tree, grow tall)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(tree, be tall)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(tree, grow tall)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(tree, be tall)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(tree, grow tall)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(tree, be tall)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(tree, grow tall)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tree, be tall)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(tree, grow tall)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tree, be tall)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(tree, grow tall)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(tree, be tall)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tree, be tall)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(tree, be tall)

Typical implies Plausible

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tree, be tall)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tree, be tall)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(tree, be tall)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(oak tree, has evolve into tall strong attractive tree)