tree: need water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents christmas tree
Weight: 0.81
, berry
Weight: 0.63
, vegetation
Weight: 0.62
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.86
, apple tree
Weight: 0.80
, chestnut tree
Weight: 0.79
, maple tree
Weight: 0.77
, oak tree
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
need water 1.00
get water 0.91
take in water 0.86
produce water 0.82
lose water 0.81
suck up water 0.81
be full of water 0.80
conserve water 0.80
improve water 0.80
absorb water 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(christmas tree, need water)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tree, need water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tree, need water)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(christmas tree, need water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tree, need water)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(christmas tree, need water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(christmas tree, need water)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tree, need water)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(tree, need water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tree, need water)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(tree, need water)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(tree, need water)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(tree, take in water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tree, need water)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tree, take in water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tree, need water)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(tree, take in water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(tree, need water)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(tree, get water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tree, need water)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tree, get water)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(tree, need water)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tree, need water)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tree, need water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tree, need water)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tree, need water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tree, need water)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(christmas tree, need water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(tree, need water)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(christmas tree, need water)