trend: has state jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, policy
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.59
, strategy
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings cloud
Weight: 0.60
, convergence
Weight: 0.60
, denim
Weight: 0.57
, pattern
Weight: 0.35
, decline
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state jobs 1.00
jobs 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(topic, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(trend, has state jobs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(trend, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(topic, has state jobs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(trend, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(topic, has state jobs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(topic, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(trend, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(trend, has state jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(trend, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(trend, has state jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(trend, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(trend, jobs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(trend, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(trend, jobs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(trend, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(trend, jobs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(trend, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(trend, jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(trend, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(trend, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(trend, has state jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(trend, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(trend, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(trend, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(topic, has state jobs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(trend, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(topic, has state jobs)