tribe: be important in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents name
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, country
Weight: 0.58
, partner
Weight: 0.53
Siblings cherokee
Weight: 0.56
, yoruba
Weight: 0.56
, maori
Weight: 0.45
, flathead
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in india 1.00
be in africa 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(country, be in africa)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tribe, be important in india)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tribe, be important in india)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(country, be in africa)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tribe, be important in india)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(country, be in africa)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(country, be in africa)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(tribe, be important in india)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(tribe, be important in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tribe, be important in india)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(tribe, be important in india)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(tribe, be important in india)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(tribe, be in africa)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(tribe, be important in india)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tribe, be in africa)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tribe, be important in india)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(tribe, be in africa)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(tribe, be important in india)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tribe, be in africa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(tribe, be important in india)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tribe, be important in india)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tribe, be important in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tribe, be important in india)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tribe, be important in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tribe, be important in india)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(country, be in africa)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(tribe, be important in india)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(country, be in africa)