trooper: wear hats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents officer
Weight: 0.51
, police officer
Weight: 0.49
, vehicle
Weight: 0.47
Siblings man
Weight: 0.66
, police
Weight: 0.34
, police car
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear hats 1.00
wear campaign hats 0.92
wear purple 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(trooper, wear hats)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(trooper, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear hats)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(trooper, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear hats)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(trooper, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(trooper, wear hats)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(trooper, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(trooper, wear hats)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(trooper, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(trooper, wear purple)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(trooper, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(trooper, wear purple)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(trooper, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(trooper, wear campaign hats)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(trooper, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(trooper, wear campaign hats)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(trooper, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(trooper, wear purple)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(trooper, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(trooper, wear campaign hats)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(trooper, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(trooper, wear purple)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(trooper, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(trooper, wear campaign hats)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(trooper, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(trooper, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(trooper, wear hats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(trooper, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(trooper, wear hats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(trooper, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, wear hats)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(trooper, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, wear hats)