trout: be at restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fish
Weight: 0.71
, player
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, cold water
Weight: 0.53
Siblings rainbow
Weight: 0.58
, catfish
Weight: 0.39
, chinook salmon
Weight: 0.39
, sockeye salmon
Weight: 0.38
, salmon
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at restaurant 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(trout, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(catfish, be at restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(trout, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(catfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(catfish, be at restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(trout, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(trout, be at restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(trout, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(trout, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(trout, be at restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(trout, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(trout, be at restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(trout, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(catfish, be at restaurant)