trout: taste muddy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.72
, fish
Weight: 0.71
, player
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings rainbow trout
Weight: 0.79

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste muddy 1.00
taste bad 0.79
taste good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(trout, taste muddy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(trout, taste muddy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, taste bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(trout, taste muddy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(thing, taste bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(trout, taste muddy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(trout, taste muddy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(trout, taste muddy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(trout, taste muddy)

Similarity expansion

0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(trout, taste muddy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(trout, taste bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(trout, taste muddy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(trout, taste bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(trout, taste muddy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(trout, taste bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(trout, taste muddy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(trout, taste bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(trout, taste muddy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(trout, taste muddy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(trout, taste muddy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(trout, taste muddy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(trout, taste muddy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(trout, taste muddy) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(trout, taste muddy) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)