trucker: drive with hazards on

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.52
, group
Weight: 0.50
, driver
Weight: 0.48
, vehicle
Weight: 0.47
, business
Weight: 0.45
Siblings bus driver
Weight: 0.34
, construction worker
Weight: 0.33
, pickup truck
Weight: 0.33
, dump truck
Weight: 0.33
, semi truck
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
drive with hazards on 1.00
drive with hazards 1.00
turn on hazards 0.94
flash hazards 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(trucker, drive with hazards on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(trucker, drive with hazards on)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(trucker, drive with hazards on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(trucker, drive with hazards)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(trucker, drive with hazards on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(trucker, drive with hazards)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(trucker, drive with hazards on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(trucker, drive with hazards)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(trucker, drive with hazards on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(trucker, drive with hazards)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(trucker, drive with hazards on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(trucker, turn on hazards)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(trucker, drive with hazards on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(trucker, flash hazards)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(trucker, drive with hazards on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(trucker, turn on hazards)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(trucker, drive with hazards on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(trucker, flash hazards)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(trucker, drive with hazards on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(trucker, turn on hazards)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(trucker, drive with hazards on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(trucker, flash hazards)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(trucker, drive with hazards on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(trucker, turn on hazards)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(trucker, drive with hazards on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(trucker, flash hazards)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(trucker, drive with hazards on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(trucker, drive with hazards on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(trucker, drive with hazards on)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(trucker, drive with hazards on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(trucker, drive with hazards on)