trucker: wear hats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.52
, group
Weight: 0.50
, driver
Weight: 0.48
, vehicle
Weight: 0.47
, business
Weight: 0.45
Siblings bus driver
Weight: 0.34
, construction worker
Weight: 0.33
, pickup truck
Weight: 0.33
, dump truck
Weight: 0.33
, semi truck
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear hats 1.00
wear headsets 0.80
wear cowboy boots 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(trucker, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, wear hats)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(trucker, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(construction worker, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(construction worker, wear hats)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(trucker, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(trucker, wear hats)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(trucker, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(trucker, wear headsets)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(trucker, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(trucker, wear cowboy boots)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(trucker, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(trucker, wear headsets)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(trucker, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(trucker, wear cowboy boots)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(trucker, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(trucker, wear headsets)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(trucker, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(trucker, wear headsets)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(trucker, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(trucker, wear cowboy boots)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(trucker, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(trucker, wear cowboy boots)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(trucker, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(trucker, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(trucker, wear hats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(trucker, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(trucker, wear hats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(trucker, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear hats)