tube: be better than state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surface
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.60
, conduit
Weight: 0.60
, video
Weight: 0.56
, word
Weight: 0.56
Siblings mucous membrane
Weight: 0.34
, tub
Weight: 0.33
, duct tape
Weight: 0.33
, substrate
Weight: 0.33
, valve
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than state 1.00
be better than solid state 0.92
be stronger than bar 0.79
is quicker 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tube, be better than state)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(tube, be better than state)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tube, be better than state)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(tube, be better than solid state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tube, be better than state)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(tube, be stronger than bar)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tube, be better than state)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(tube, be stronger than bar)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tube, be better than state)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(tube, be stronger than bar)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tube, be better than state)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(tube, be better than solid state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tube, be better than state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(tube, be stronger than bar)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tube, be better than state)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tube, be better than solid state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tube, be better than state)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(tube, be better than solid state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tube, be better than state)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tube, is quicker)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tube, be better than state)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tube, is quicker)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tube, be better than state)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tube, is quicker)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tube, be better than state)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(tube, is quicker)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tube, be better than state)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tube, be better than state)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tube, be better than state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tube, be better than state)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tube, be better than state)