tube: be in deicer boots alternately inflated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surface
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.60
, conduit
Weight: 0.60
, video
Weight: 0.56
, word
Weight: 0.56
Siblings mucous membrane
Weight: 0.34
, tub
Weight: 0.33
, duct tape
Weight: 0.33
, substrate
Weight: 0.33
, valve
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in deicer boots alternately inflated 1.00
be in deicer boots inflated 0.96
be in deicer boots 0.91
be in boots alternately inflated 0.89
be in boots inflated 0.84
be in boots 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(tube, be in deicer boots inflated)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tube, be in deicer boots)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(tube, be in deicer boots inflated)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(tube, be in deicer boots)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tube, be in boots alternately inflated)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(tube, be in boots alternately inflated)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(tube, be in boots inflated)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(tube, be in deicer boots)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(tube, be in boots)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(tube, be in boots inflated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tube, be in deicer boots inflated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(tube, be in boots inflated)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(tube, be in boots)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(tube, be in deicer boots)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(tube, be in boots)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(tube, be in deicer boots inflated)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tube, be in boots alternately inflated)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(tube, be in boots alternately inflated)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(tube, be in boots)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tube, be in boots inflated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(tube, be in deicer boots alternately inflated)