tuberculosis: be considered re-emerging infectious disease

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pathogen
Weight: 0.73
, illness
Weight: 0.72
, disease
Weight: 0.66
, organism
Weight: 0.65
, infection
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lyme disease
Weight: 0.38
, malaria
Weight: 0.38
, pneumonia
Weight: 0.38
, measles
Weight: 0.38
, influenza
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered infectious disease 1.00
be considered re-emerging infectious disease 1.00
is infectious disease 0.99
is important infectious disease 0.98
is infectious 0.94
be considered disease 0.89
be considered re-emerging disease 0.89
is communicable disease 0.88
is important disease 0.87
has state disease 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(illness, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(illness, has state disease)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(illness, has state disease)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state disease)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(malaria, has state disease)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(measles, is infectious)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(influenza, is infectious)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(malaria, be considered disease)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(measles, is infectious disease)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(measles, has state disease)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(influenza, is communicable disease)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(illness, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(measles, is infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(measles, is infectious disease)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(influenza, is infectious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(influenza, is infectious)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(measles, is infectious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(measles, is infectious)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(malaria, be considered disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(malaria, be considered disease)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(influenza, is communicable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(influenza, is communicable disease)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(measles, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(measles, has state disease)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(malaria, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(malaria, has state disease)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(influenza, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(influenza, has state disease)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(tuberculosis, is infectious disease)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, is infectious disease)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(tuberculosis, is important infectious disease)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tuberculosis, is infectious disease)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, is communicable disease)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, is important infectious disease)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, is infectious disease)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(tuberculosis, is communicable disease)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(tuberculosis, is communicable disease)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(tuberculosis, is important infectious disease)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(tuberculosis, has state disease)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, is important infectious disease)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, is communicable disease)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, has state disease)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, has state disease)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tuberculosis, has state disease)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(illness, has state disease)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(measles, is infectious disease)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(influenza, is communicable disease)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(influenza, is infectious)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(measles, has state disease)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(malaria, be considered disease)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(measles, is infectious)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(influenza, has state disease)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(malaria, has state disease)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(illness, has state disease)