tulip: be elegant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flower
Weight: 0.70
, bulb
Weight: 0.69
, plant
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, orange
Weight: 0.50
Siblings daffodil
Weight: 0.49
, peony
Weight: 0.38
, lily
Weight: 0.36
, orchid
Weight: 0.36
, light bulb
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be elegant 1.00
be beautiful and delicate 0.77
has beautiful color 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(flower, has beautiful color)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(tulip, be elegant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(flower, be beautiful and delicate)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(tulip, be elegant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(tulip, be elegant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(flower, be beautiful and delicate)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(tulip, be elegant)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(flower, has beautiful color)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tulip, be elegant)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(flower, be beautiful and delicate)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tulip, be elegant)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(flower, has beautiful color)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(flower, has beautiful color)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(tulip, be elegant)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(tulip, be elegant)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(flower, be beautiful and delicate)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(tulip, be elegant)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(tulip, be elegant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(tulip, be elegant)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(tulip, be elegant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(tulip, be elegant)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(tulip, be elegant)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tulip, be elegant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(tulip, be elegant)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(tulip, be elegant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tulip, be elegant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(flower, has beautiful color)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tulip, be elegant)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(flower, be beautiful and delicate)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(tulip, be elegant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(flower, has beautiful color)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(tulip, be elegant)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(flower, be beautiful and delicate)